The ‘Great Divide’ in Music
Identifieur interne : 001A39 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001A38; suivant : 001A40The ‘Great Divide’ in Music
Auteurs : James O. Young [Canada]Source :
- The British Journal of Aesthetics [ 0007-0904 ] ; 2005-NaN.
Abstract
Several prominent philosophers of music, including Lydia Goehr and Peter Kivy, maintain that the experience of music changed drastically in about 1800. According to the great divide hypothesis, prior to 1800 audiences often scarcely attended to music. At other times, music was appreciated as part of social, civic, or religious ceremonies. After the great divide, audiences began to appreciate music as an exclusive object of aesthetic experience. The great divide hypothesis is false. The musicological record reveals that prior to the great divide music was often the exclusive object of aesthetic experience.
Url:
DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayi019
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 001506
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 001506
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000701
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 001A85
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 001A39
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The ‘Great Divide’ in Music</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Young, James O" sort="Young, James O" uniqKey="Young J" first="James O." last="Young">James O. Young</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:20CCC599ADC85FFF97A9290D2D861C459F940A82</idno><date when="2005" year="2005">2005</date><idno type="doi">10.1093/aesthj/ayi019</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/20CCC599ADC85FFF97A9290D2D861C459F940A82/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001506</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001506</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000701</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0007-0904:2005:Young J:the:great:divide</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001A85</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001A39</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001A39</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The ‘Great Divide’ in Music</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Young, James O" sort="Young, James O" uniqKey="Young J" first="James O." last="Young">James O. Young</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>James O. Young, Department of Philosophy, University of Victoria, PO Box 3045, Victoria, BC</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>BC</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">The British Journal of Aesthetics</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Brit J Aesthetics</title><idno type="ISSN">0007-0904</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-2842</idno><imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="2005-NaN">2005-NaN</date><biblScope unit="volume">45</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="175">175</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="184">184</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0007-0904</idno></series><idno type="istex">20CCC599ADC85FFF97A9290D2D861C459F940A82</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/aesthj/ayi019</idno><idno type="local">ayi019</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0007-0904</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Several prominent philosophers of music, including Lydia Goehr and Peter Kivy, maintain that the experience of music changed drastically in about 1800. According to the great divide hypothesis, prior to 1800 audiences often scarcely attended to music. At other times, music was appreciated as part of social, civic, or religious ceremonies. After the great divide, audiences began to appreciate music as an exclusive object of aesthetic experience. The great divide hypothesis is false. The musicological record reveals that prior to the great divide music was often the exclusive object of aesthetic experience.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Canada</li></country></list><tree><country name="Canada"><noRegion><name sortKey="Young, James O" sort="Young, James O" uniqKey="Young J" first="James O." last="Young">James O. Young</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/OperaV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001A39 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001A39 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= OperaV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:20CCC599ADC85FFF97A9290D2D861C459F940A82
|texte= The ‘Great Divide’ in Music
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.21. |  |